Bri responds to Frank.

Link.

This is the same Bri who said,

I want to state first that I am totally and completely against the Blasphemy Challenge. It is disturbing and basically a load of crap!

Uh, skip that and just read how she creams Frank.

[source]

How to be a lying chicken the Frank Walton way!

He's lying, again!

Anyway, let's debunk Frank's blog. Now, Frank said that Brian Sapient avoided a debate with Todd Friel.

Brian Sapient avoided a debate with Todd Friel by claiming he "doesn't have anything real new, he's uninteresting, he's dishonest, and he does a lot of interrupting, a lot of commercial breaks when you're saying important stuff, he does a lot of quote-mining..." etc.

*SIGH*

I already wrote about this in my other blog:

Yesterday, on The Way of The Master radio, Todd Friel said that Brian Sapient "...won't agree to come on the show."

Ray Comfort was out of the studio when Todd said it and came in 20 minutes after the comment.

Where was Ray to expose Todd's lie? Sapient agreed to come on the show if Ray AND Kirk were going to be there. You can download Brian ripping Todd a new one, right here. Just right-click and save it.

By the way, Todd is a stupid name, it's obvious why he turned out so stupid. LOL! That's logical, stupid name=stupid person. Remember that.

Todd is known for getting his butt kicked in debates like with The Infidel Guy and Dan Barker. Todd cut HillbillyAtheist off the air when he appeared. Hillbilly never complained about that, but you know... Todd Friel sucks anyway. Okay, I admit it, Friel told Hillbilly that he had to cut his interview short! But it sounded like he interrupted him! Honestly, it did! You can check out what HBA had to say about his appearance on Way of The Master, right here.

And Todd getting his ass handed to him by Dan Barker here.

Update: Brian just received an email from Ray Comfort. It looks like Sapient won't go on the "Way of the Master" radio show. See, Todd Friel wants Sapient on his show but is too chicken to have him on his show too. Makes sense, doesn't it?

Update: Stupid Frank Walton has something to say about this here and here.

Sapient would rather debate Todd's bosses (Ray and Kirk). Ray and Kirk aren't as tough as Todd Friel but still.

That's 2 on 1. Right, Frank? Because you also said this...

3. Don't do one-on-one debates. Instead, have you and your friends debate your lone opponent.

As I said above, Sapient will gladly debate Kirk and Ray, all by himself. They're very easy to debate. Friel is too tough.

Do you still want to call him a coward?

4. If you find out an opponent of yours is a darn good debater, avoid debating them by lying about them. Say that he's a a quote-miner, he's too easy to beat, he's a plagiarizer, or a liar, etc. By ruining their reputation it'll make it look like they are not worth debating.

More lies!

I've seen how the members from TheologyWeb debate. What does TheologyWeb have to do with this? I don't know!!!! But I'll bring it up anyway. They suck!

Back to tearing Frank's blog a new one...

6.Make sure your opponent is as shallow minded as they come, or unprepared, or naive.


That's right, only debate those you know you can beat. Don't debate those who are good thinking theists. That may leave an opportunity for your opponent to outsmart you. And you can't have that happen. But if that happens, again, gang up on him. Got to rule #3.

LOL! What a liar! They have me to back up Frank Walton and lies and I'm not shallow at all. This blog is proof of that. Also, Ray and Kirk, they're not shallow. No really. They're PhD quality, baby! They're so not tough that Brian Sapient will debate them.

At TheologyWeb, (which has nothing to do with what Frank said), the theists gang up on the atheists, just like how atheists gang up on theists! Just look around the forum for 2 seconds. (Random thread!)

3. Don't do one-on-one debates. Instead, have you and your friends debate your lone opponent.

Always, gang up on your opponent. Remember, it's easier to beat up a guy when you have more people with you. Brian Sapient usually has 5 (that's right, 5, including himself) people against a lone Christian. 5 against 1! Can you beat that!

Oh, man...

Brian has said that he will take on Ray and Kirk by himself and he's been waiting on Ergun to respond for over a week. And guess what? When Ergun Caner came on, it was 4 "Rational Response Squad" members (Brian Sapient, Rook Hawkins, Kelly, and Brian Flemming) against Ergun Caner. Ha! And Frank Walton complains that the almighty Rational Response Squad debates 5 against 1 measly Christian.


Now that you know how to be a lying chicken the Frank Walton way, it's time to learn how to debate the TheologyWeb way!

Yay!

Are you ready? Here it goes.

1. Lie your ass off.
2. Grow it back.
3. Lie it off again.

That's right! It's that simple! LOL! Yeah, I know Frank Walton doesn't own theologyweb.com but we'll just use it anyway.

[source]

Does Frank think Bruce Lee sucks?

The following screen shot is from Frank's 'I've been tagged' blog.



Now, I'm not trying to say that Frank thinks Bruce Lee sucked as a fighter...but as an atheist!

That's right, Bruce Lee was an atheist.

I'm pretty sure that Frank likes watching Bruce Lee's movies and everything. But does he care that Bruce was an atheist?

Just check out Frank's blog headline.

(If you’re an atheist and you’re reading this, don’t take yourself too seriously, okay? We love ya, but we hate your philosophical views.)

Wait a minute, that means he loved Bruce Lee! So, I guess he didn't think he sucked. Well, he thinks his philosophy sucked.

Anyway, I'm a real big fan of Bruce Lee and I wish he was still alive, too. I don't follow his Eastern Philosophy though. That sucks. Hmm, I guess that means I think Bruce Lee sucks! Oh, no!

[source]

Frank Walton doesn't care about his parents!

We've found the reason that Frank Walton has so much time to spew lies on the internet. Not only can he not handle looking at slutty women, but his parents are also "dismayed" by his ridiculous beliefs.



Maybe they also know about how he blogs on "atheismsucks" with such an immature online persona it's no wonder that Frank Walton has parents that are dismayed by him. Poor Frank Walton, does someone need a hug? Can't handle slutty women, can't handle parents, has a mind disorder (theism), and spends his days writing to atheists online linking them to his crappy blog all day... what a pathetic excuse for existence. What a pathetic excuse for a Christian. It's no wonder the Rational Response Squad equates theism with a mind disorder, they even said that Martin Luther King Jr had a mental disorder. Cool, huh? Here you have a Christian who let's the world know with almost every correspondence that Christianity is indeed a religion of intolerance. Good job Frank, keep helping people to see why Christianity does nothing to make you a good person.

Now be a good little boy Frank and abandon those myths so that your parents don't have to be discouraged and depressed at your amazing low thinking capacity. How disrespectful of you! Remember, folks, if you disagree with your parents that means you don't care about them. Disagree=apathy toward the individual. The next time you disagree with your mother who says bacon tastes better than eggs, that means you don't care about her! Shame on you!

[source]

I guess Frank is married?

I was checking out Frank's new blog, Brian Sapient goes Girls Gone Wild!, in which he writes about his jealousy of Brian (he was recording Kelly and she quickly flashed him) and Kelly's chest. Yup, that's right, he was jealous of Brian's chest because he actually has tits. There was no nudity in the video, which was wrong because I wanted to see all A cups of Kelly's chest. Brian Sapient has nice tits too.

Anyway, when I was done reading, I noticed that he had 4 comments at the time, so I decided to read the comments and check out what his readers had to say. As it turns out, Frank is married!

I don't understand! Just look at his comments.

He talks about having a wife. That is so hard for me to understand. He's married? Wait a minute, he's married and has a wife. Hmm, so does that mean he's married and has a wife? That's just so hard to understand!

Frank's myspace tells another story. His myspace says he's "single". But he told a guy named HGissufficient that he put single in his myspace because not everybody in his group is married. See. That is just so hard to understand.

[source]

Frank's blog on Dawkins.

In an interview in 1997, Richard Dawkins was asked to "give an example of a genetic mutation or an evolutionary process which can be seen to increase the information in the genome." Apparently unable to answer, he paused a long time and finally responded by changing the subject.

1. According to Dawkins, he paused because the question revealed that the interviewers were creationists, that he had been duped about their motives. He paused to think about how to handle them, and the change of subject occurred due to the several minutes when he confronted them being omitted from the video (Dawkins 2003).
   
   
2. The question is equivalent to asking how complexity could evolve, which Dawkins has covered in at least four books (The Blind Watchmaker, River Out of Eden, Climbing Mount Improbable, and A Devil's Chaplain). He has answered the question at great length.
   
   
3. The ability of a single person to answer a question is largely irrelevant. The scientific literature is rife with examples of information increasing.

Don't you ever do some research, Frank? These are great excuses for chumping out on a simple question. Here's more.

[source]