FRANK WALTON MAKING EXCUSES FOR HIS WEAKNESS

For those of you who don't know, Axiom tech (aka QXDC) has challenged Frank Walton to a debate. Axiom should have know that Frank doesn't have an honest bone in his body. I mean, look at my friend Rich Rodriguez. When he debated Frank he knew that Frank was never honest anyway, but decided to debate Frank anyway, but only to bail out of the debate because of Frank's dishonesty. Makes perfect sense, don't it? In fact, that was his excuse. And Frank, being the cry-baby that he is, complained about it. But Axiom is wasting his time with Walton who is the even worse than Ray Comfort at trying to argue the theist side. That is why Brian Sapient is going to argue with him. He's going to argue with Comfort just to waste his time. People with a life do that. And we all know that Brian Sapient, who uses his mother for money, has a life. As you can see from the following post Frank tries to weasel his way out of their exchange over 125 words!

Axiom-Tech, You have just broken one of the rules of the debate. As you can see in the very first post in this forum (by Knight) you were to write an opening no more than 1500 words, yet you’re opening is 1625 words (not counting the references… I don’t count those… but, uh, it seemed liked you were doing more arguing in the third reference! Give me a break!). And you wonder why I called you a moron? As far as I can tell none of the moderators warned you about this infraction, which is unfortunate, and which is why I'm posting this message myself. My sole purpose of going to a forum was to have a fair debate while being properly moderated. I will post my opening tomorrow, but if you continue to break the rules of the debate (or weasel in more arguments in your reference section), I will not continue it. I hope you would be more civil in your conduct. Thanks, Frank Walton


Talk about grasping for straws. All you can do with 125 words is make more arguments. What's the big deal? What Axiom is doing is throwing a last punch after the bell rings. What's the big deal? Sheesh! I can't believe this joker believes he would have lasted a micro second against my friend Rich Rodriguez. That's why Rodriguez decided not to finish his debate with him. That's pretty logical if you think about it: Rich Rodriguez would have beaten Frank so badly that he decided not to finish debating him. That's an absolutely non-cowardly thing to do. No really, it isn't. So don't go off calling men like Rodriguez a coward. He's so brave he won't debate Frank. Makes absolute sense.

Rich Rodriguez had more to say:

####QUOTE####

QXDC is one of the weakest Atheist I have ever come across, he has been regularly pwned by both Rook and I in the stickam room. Frank can't even handle a wanna be Atheist! lol!

Why do I call him a wanna be Atheist? Does this look like something an Atheist would do?

(Axiom tech on the left getting friendly with Kent Hovind)

####END QUOTE####

You see, Rich Rodriguez wants atheists to not have any Christians as friends. And that's exactly what the Rational Response Squad wants. Take it from my friend, Mr. GAWN (a faithful RRS member) when he said:

Fuckin' Christians, if I can't convert 'em I'll burn 'em. Learn 'em a lesson with my Smith and Wesson straight in they sternum.

From the song I would say God

That's the RRS way, man! Screw all you, Christians!

[source]

Ray Comfort, Kirk Cameron VS. Brian Sapient and Kellym78

It'll be Kelly and Sapient, May 5th in NYC talking with Way of the Master's Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron on ABC's website. Martin Bashir will moderate and you'll be able to see the whole thing live (90 minutes) on ABC's website (probably the Nightline section). Then there will be a recap on a Nightline segment later. Remember, Sapient never wanted to debate Way of the Master radio host Todd Friel. You know why? Because Friel is too easy to beat in a debate. He's so easy to whip and embarrass, my leader, Brian Sapient, said he won't debate him. What? He's not using any excuses not to debate Friel. And Sapient certainly is not scared of him. That's a lie straight from Frank Walton's mouth. Here's what that stupid Christian fundy said,

Now as we all know Brian Sapient said he'd only debate The Way of the Master pupils (Comfort and Cameron) if only Todd Friel was not present in the debate. Why? Because Friel is much more hard hitting than Cameron and Comfort (with all due respect to them). In fact, Sapient suggested Cameron and Comfort. You see, Sapient is still a softie.

*SIGH*

No, Franky. You're the softie, buddy. Because you can't handle the truth. Sapient has the balls big enough not to debate some people. That's like Mike Tyson saying "I won't fight you physically, which proves I can beat you up physically." Make sense, dip stick? It sure does in an atheist kind of way.

[source]

Chuck Norris: ‘Secular Progressive Agenda’ Responsible for Virginia Tech Tragedy

America's favorite kickass asshat is at it again. Get this, he wants the bible to be taught in public schools. What a loon. He should do it the secular progressive way: teaching Darwin's theory of evolution where we learn men are no better than animals. That's right, the VTech shooting was like duck hunting. What's the harm in teaching people that? Stupid fundy Christians! But Chucky has this to say...

--------------------------------------------------------------------

...

On April 16, 2007, more heroes left Virginia. This time they were students and professors at Virginia Tech University – 32 to be exact. And like those on 9/11, they were martyrs in a war they weren't fighting – unintentional patriots caught in a head-on clash with our culture's values, denials and degradation.

...

Heroes from the holocaust to Norris hall

Most have heard by now of the heroic measures of people like 76-year-old Virginia Tech professor and Holocaust survivor, Liviu Librescu, who shielded his students when the shooter tried to enter a classroom. The Jerusalem Post cited his son Joe: "My father blocked the doorway with his body and asked the students to flee. Students started opening windows and jumping out." Librescu was killed by the gunman, and last Thursday he was given an honorable burial in Israel – one fit for a hero.

As one blog notes, there were several valiant students too.

During Monday's tragic shootings at Virginia Tech, college senior Kevin Sterne grabbed an electrical cord and fashioned a tourniquet to stem the bleeding from the bullet wounds to his thigh. Twenty-year-old Derek O'Dell, who had been shot in the arm, shut the classroom door and along with some other students, pushed himself against it so the gunman, who had briefly left the classroom, couldn't reenter. Twenty-year-old Trey Perkins used his clothing to staunch the wounds of bleeding classmates.

As time goes by, I'm sure that we will hear more heroic deeds. Truly, every victim of this reprehensible executioner is in some way heroic, for they were injured or died in the midst of a cultural war in which our schools increasingly have become a battleground. As Dr. Marisa Randazzo, a psychologist who contributed to an extensive study of school shootings for the Secret Service, concurred, ''... the intensity and frequency of the attacks have increased since the events at Columbine.''

Are we partially to blame?

Though one can point to Cho's own psychotic behavior and our graphic slasher media as potential contributors to his deplorable murder spree, we must also hesitate to consider how we as a society are possibly contributing to the growth of these academic killing fields. I believe those who wield the baton of the secular progressive agenda bear significant responsibility for the escalation of school shootings. Even conservatives who refuse to speak when evil flourishes must acknowledge some culpability.

We teach our children they are nothing more than glorified apes, yet we don't expect them to act like monkeys. We place our value in things, yet expect our children to value people. We disrespect one another, but expect our children to respect others. We terminate children in the womb, but are surprised when children outside the womb terminate other children. We push God to the side, but expect our children to be godly. We've abandoned moral absolutes, yet expect our children to obey the universal commandment, ''Thou shalt not murder.''

Though I respect the Buddhist, Muslim and Jew who shared at the VTU convocation, our country needs to return and call out to the God of our founders, Jesus Christ. As Reverend Schenck concludes:

When kids kill kids, there's something desperately wrong in the culture. No amount of laws, police officers, courts or prisons can stop a murder from happening. Only a conscience built on the fear of God can do that. Whether it's teaching the sanctity of life or God's commandment against murder, Christian leaders must tell young people that accountability for doing wrong doesn't stop with death. We will ultimately face God as a righteous judge. People who contemplate committing this kind of act need to know that.

If we are ever to restore civility in our land and our schools, we must turn back the clocks to a time when such shocking crimes didn't even exist – when we valued life and respected one another much more then we do today. We must use the Bible (humanity's blueprint for life and ''bluebook'' for value) to retrain our youth about theirs and others' value as children of God, made in His image. We must each contribute to rebuild the infrastructure of our homes, schools, and society upon respect. Instilling strong moral character is at the heart of why I started Kickstart in schools across Texas and hope eventually to fill the schools across this land.

...

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55333



[source]

Bill O'Reilly Interviews Richard Dawkins

O'Reilly fails again. Hitler was a theist! But he was a self-contradicting theist atheist type of theist. Get it, Mr. O'Reilly?! For instance, Hitler said [Hitler's Table Talk (Adolf Hitler, London, Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1953)],

"National Socialism and religion cannot exist together....
"The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew. The deliberate lie in the matter of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity....
"Let it not be said that Christianity brought man the life of the soul, for that evolution was in the natural order of things." (p 6 & 7)

And,

"Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature. Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure." (p 43)

And,

"The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural death.... When understanding of the universe has become widespread... Christian doctrine will be convicted of absurdity....
"Christianity has reached the peak of absurdity.... And that's why someday its structure will collapse....
"...the only way to get rid of Christianity is to allow it to die little by little....
"Christianity the liar....
"We'll see to it that the Churches cannot spread abroad teachings in conflict with the interests of the State." (p 49-52)

And,

"The reason why the ancient world was so pure, light and serene was that it knew nothing of the two great scourges: the pox and Christianity."

And,

"Originally, Christianity was merely an incarnation of Bolshevism, the destroyer....
"The decisive falsification of Jesus' doctrine was the work of St.Paul. He gave himself to this work... for the purposes of personal exploitation....
"Didn't the world see, carried on right into the Middle Ages, the same old system of martyrs, tortures, faggots? Of old, it was in the name of Christianity. Today, it's in the name of Bolshevism. Yesterday the instigator was Saul: the instigator today, Mardochai. Saul was changed into St.Paul, and Mardochai into Karl Marx. By exterminating this pest, we shall do humanity a service of which our soldiers can have no idea." (p 63-65)

And this is my favorite part:

"Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery.... (p 118-119)

LOL! Hey Hitler is beginning to sound like Brian Sapient there, huh? But Hitler also said,

"Kerrl, with noblest of intentions, wanted to attempt a synthesis between National Socialism and Christianity. I don't believe the thing's possible, and I see the obstacle in Christianity itself....
"Pure Christianity-- the Christianity of the catacombs-- is concerned with translating Christian doctrine into facts. It leads quite simply to the annihilation of mankind. It is merely whole-hearted Bolshevism, under a tinsel of metaphysics." (p 119 & 120)

And,

"There is something very unhealthy about Christianity." (p 339)

And,

"It would always be disagreeable for me to go down to posterity as a man who made concessions in this field. I realize that man, in his imperfection, can commit innumerable errors-- but to devote myself deliberately to errors, that is something I cannot do. I shall never come personally to terms with the Christian lie."
"Our epoch in the next 200 years will certainly see the end of the disease of Christianity.... My regret will have been that I couldn't... behold ." (p 278)

So, this is all proof that Adolf Hitler was a theist, okay? But an atheist sort of theist.

Also, the SS had "Gott mitt uns" (God with us) on their belt buckles! Nazi Gauleiter Otto Hellmuth said, "We all know that God is with us, but let's not rely on God alone. Let's work so hard and fight so fiercely that God cannot refuse to hand the victory palm to Germany." You see, the Christianity Hitler and the Nazis wanted was the type where God kisses their butt. That's very Christian of them.

And many founding fathers were not Christians. Even though they wanted Christian philosophy. But again, they were deist type of Christians. No contradictions there, folks.

*SIGH*

Anyway, this was not a debate, people. It was an interview even though Bill O'Reilly never really asked Dawkins any questions about evolution or his best-selling book. O'Reilly did nothing but challenge Dawkins. That's an interview, people. Not a debate. And I think Richard Dawkins did pretty good. Especially the part where he said "we're working on it" when he couldn't admit where the world came from. That's the best darn argument I ever heard! All hail, Dicky Dawkins! The interview was only 5 minutes though.

Stalin did not kill because of his atheism. He wanted to have complete control (like so many atheists like Pol Pot and Mao Zedong). So Stalin wanted to get rid of anything that was already controlling people... like religion. We here at Rational Response Squad also want to get rid of anything that is already controlling people. We want complete control over religion. And, yes, we're atheists like Stalin. But before you think we're being just like Stalin, think twice! We're not, okay? This all makes sense if you were an atheist.

Stalin killed people because of his hunger for control and power, not his atheism. We at Rational Response Squad want control and power over religion so it won't screw up our society. But again, we're not like atheists like Stalin. See how consistent and well thought out we are?

Dawkins totally and utterly wasted Bill when he said:

"...Hitler and Stalin both had mustaches, but we don't say it was their mustaches that made them evil."

But we do say Christians have theism, and it is because theism that make them evil. No double standard there. See, Dawkins was a genius.

Bill got pwned and so he tried to play it off with a laugh.

LOL!

Short interview, but I enjoyed watching it.

[source]

Westboro Baptist Church to pay more than $3,000!

Matthew Snyder...

...fought in a stupid war and died for it.

Fascist Christian fundy Fred Phelps has to pay $3,000 to the parents of a dead Corporal who fought in Iraq. We at the Rational Response Squad are against Bush's illegal war in Iraq. Yeah sure, Phelps is against this war too, but he's a Christian so we have absolutely nothing in common with him. Stupid lame brain Christians! This Corporal died for no good cause in Iraq and we will exploit his death like Fred Phelps. That's the logical and non-hypocritical thing to do.

[source]

WBC to Preach at Funerals of Virginia Tech Dead!

I've had enough of them!

Link.

Who are these stupid right-wing Christian preachers to preach hope after a so-called tragedy? That's the most sickening thing I ever read or heard! We should be preaching despair and no-hope to these so-called victims. All that Cho guy did was kill a bunch of evolved monkeys. That's it! It's like what my main man Dicky Dawkins wrote:

In a universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won't find any rhyme or reason in it, nor any justice. The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference. As that unhappy poet A.E. Housman put it: `For Nature, heartless, witless Nature Will neither care nor know.' DNA neither cares nor knows. DNA just is. And we dance to its music." (Dawkins R., "River out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life," Phoenix: London, 1996, p.155. Emphasis in original)

That's right, we ought to dance to some Mr. GAWN (a fellow brother in the Rational Response Squad crew) music when a so-called massacre happens. The best part was when Mr. Gawn said,

Fuckin' Christians, if I can't convert 'em I'll burn 'em. Learn 'em a lesson with my Smith and Wesson straight in they sternum.

From the song I would say God

Cho must have liked that. Even Harris and Klebold at Columbine could have appreciated that. Stupid Christians! Ha! I laugh at your hope! We atheists have no hope. You know what? I hope you Christians have no hope!


[source]

A response to Rich Rodriguez

Rich Rodriguez said,

Here is a fake blog Mr. Walton created masquerading as Infidel Mike: http://infidelmike.blogspot.com/

[3:37 PM, April 11, 2007 at christianpwnage101.blogspot.com]

Mr. Rodriguez is badly mistaken. Infidel Mike is a real person who is an atheist. He is a part of our staff and helps us post against Frank Walton.

And it should interest the readers that Brian Sapient actually supports us:

Miguel De Alba is a real person and is responsible for the infidelmike.blogspot.com blogsite. That's the blogsite I support.

[11:17 PM, April 03, 2007 at killtheafterlife.blogspot.com]

We are a part of the Rational Response Squad group and even have named ourselves after them. We're perplexed why Mr. Rodriguez would think Frank Walton has anything to do with us. We are against Frank Walton and everything he stands for! A quick glance through our blogsite will prove it. Mr. Walton has lied time and time again about atheism. And we prove it over and over again. We hope that Mr. Rodriguez would reconsider what he said. We are on his side and recommend you read his debate with Frank Walton. Clearly, he is beating Mr. Walton.